First Once I went to a giant stadium screens I told a friend my disappointment because they could not see the television broadcast. My friend told me that was not done to prevent public and players bristled at what could become a live broadcast of the arbitration always errors.
four years ago, Zidane was sent off because his header was being envisioned by the stadium monitors. It took me face the fact, not accepted. What the game was being broadcast live at the stadium, including repetitions? What heads fit?
On Sunday, Argentina has won his third goal was offside. Third World I mean ... This time it has served to push forward a party that Mexico was more complicated than expected. The odd thing is that the referee and the assistant have been consulting a few minutes while the images were passed on flagrant move the stadium screens. They have not imported tens of thousands of spectators, as well as the protagonists of the party, were aware of the reality of the play and have given
I do not know if the referee of Germany - England will has taken a look at the relay to whip for failure to provide as valid a goal obtained by Lampard set that left the tiny diapers Bambridge theft by Michel at 86.
errors I can accept arbitration. Never mind the reason: they're bad, they have evil intentions, which are purchased ... I accept and assume since there are things that as a passive spectator, one can not ever be able to control. What is unaffordable is that judges commit the gall to rule against the facts when you can not host the classic excuse of not having seen either the play.
What has happened in Sunday's is a real scandal, an intervention direct and flagrant, with malice but with diurnidad , the fate of this World Cup. An attack in the game that would call out to the public, since such abuse cause helplessness, powerlessness and the feeling that not enough what you are able to demonstrate on the pitch.
sporting aspects go into the background. How can you talk about the rest of the game when players of Mexico have received such stick? Before, the player guarding the benefit of the doubt, that the referee had not seen or that, simply, was a calamity, now we have passed the "no me da like, you already know it's not a goal, but I'm in charge here. Out of school and shut up, it's over I will expel the king ".
Please, at least to stop broadcasting images of the scoreboards. It's the least we can ask.
Sorry, I was me Cut the roll. And see that there are things to talk about, as it has been entering Veron and mark Mexico. Another day.
PD In 2006 there were no pictures at stages, but Zidane was expelled because the fourth official, English Cantalejo, saw the attack on Materazzi on your monitor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment